트럼프 천하재편정국 - 284. 잔인한 무기산업, 옥죄는 감시 산업

http://cafe.daum.net/onukang/ZkWC/4647 

잔인한 돈 : 끝없는 전쟁으로 돈을 버는 20대 기업을 보라 Blood Money: Meet the Top 20 Companies Profiting From Endless War  By Elias Marat Mar 5, 2019 - 7:50:17 PM                  https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/blood-money-meet-the-top-20-companies-profiting-from-endless-war.html 스톡홀름 국제 평화 연구소에 따르면 군비 지출은 전 세계적으로 증가하고 있으며 2017 년에는 1.1 % 증가했다. 미국의 무기 지출은 96 억 달러 증가하여 세계적인 상승세를 이끌었고 미국의 지위를 군대에서 세계 최고의 소비국으로 더욱 강화했습니다. Military spending is growing around the world and in 2017 it increased by 1.1 percent, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. U.S. arms expenditures rose by $9.6 billion, driving the global rise and further consolidating the status of the United States as the world's top spender on the military-by far. 전쟁에 대한 미국의 지출은 마침내 군대- 산업 단지 military-industrial complex로 알려졌던 2차 세계대전 후 "새로운 펜타곤 자본주의"에 뿌리를 두고있다. 당시 육군 참모총장과 드와이트 D. 아이젠하워 (Dwight D. Eisenhower) 대통령이 혁명을 일으킨 이 모델은 미국의 과학 연구, 기술 및 산업 능력이 국가 긴급상황에서 "우리 군사구조의 유기적인 부분" 이 민간 경제에 이중 용도의 효과를 주는 체제이다. 이 모델은 마침내 아이젠하워 (Eisenhower)가 1961 년 작별 인사 farewell address를 통해 국민 앞에서 공개한 비판적인 군사- 민간 경제기반, 즉 "군대- 산업 단지"를 탄생시켰다. The U.S. spending on war is rooted in post-World War II "new Pentagon capitalism" that eventually became known as the military-industrial complex. The model, revolutionized by then-Army Chief of Staff and later President Dwight D. Eisenhower, ensured that the United States' scientific research, technological and industrial capacity would become "organic parts of our military structure" in conditions of national emergency, effectively giving the civilian economy a dual-use purpose. The model eventually gave birth to the sprawling military-civilian economic base, or "military-industrial complex," that Eisenhower famously criticized in his 1961 farewell address to the nation. 민간 산업, 과학 및 학계는 국방부의 끝없는 냉전 대결의 적과의 충돌 상태를 견제하기 위해 과도하고 끊임없이 확대되는 전쟁 예산과 함께 사용되어 미국의 도전받지 않은 통치를 위한 지배력을 확실하게 만들고, " 워싱턴에 의한 "군사 케인즈 주의 military Keynesian"지출의 추가 급증이 요구될 때마다 미국 경제를 "유인 정책 pump-priming"으로 견인했다. 이 모델의 주요 수혜자는 미국의 방위 산업이다. 현재 USA 투데이가 분석한 SIPRI 자료에 따르면, 미국에 현재 세계 10대 대형 군수 업체 중 5 곳이 있으며, 전세계의 상위 100대 방위 산업체가 총 무기 판매의 57 %를 차지하고 있다. Civilian industry, science, and academia were used alongside an exorbitant and perpetually-expanding war budget to underwrite the Defense Department's never-ending state of conflict with Cold War enemies, making the world safe for the unchallenged reign of the United States while "pump-priming" the U.S. economy whenever additional surges of "military Keynesian" spending by Washington was required. The main beneficiary of the model has been the U.S. defense industry. The U.S. is now home to five of the world's top 10 large military contractors, with U.S.-based companies accounting for 57 percent of total arms sales by the top 100 large defense contractors worldwide, according to SIPRI data analyzed by USA Today. 2017 년에 449 억 달러의 무기 판매를 기록한 록히드 마틴 (Lockheed Martin)과 같은 회사는 미국 정부에서 거둬들인 수익만도국세청 (IRS)과 환경보호국 (EPA)의 연간 예산을 합한 것보다 많습니다. 한편 전세계의 많은 다른 회사들은 세계 무역에서 큰 이익을 얻었으며 그 중 다수는 예멘과 같은 전장에서 인류에 대한 끔찍한 잔학 행위 및 범죄를 저지르는 데 사용됩니다. 월스트리트 24/7 Wall St 의 SIPRI 데이터에 대한 새로운 분석에 따르면, 아래의 20개 기업들은 정부의 전비 중독 addiction to war-spending과 전 세계 분쟁 지역에서의 무기 수요를 통해서 가장 많은 돈을 벌었습니다. Companies such as Lockheed Martin, which made $44.9 billion in arms sales in 2017, enjoy revenue from the U.S. government alone that totals more than the combined annual budgets of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Meanwhile, a number of other companies across the globe have raked in handsome profits from the global trade in arms, many of which are used to commit horrific atrocities and crimes against humanity in such battlegrounds as Yemen. According to a new analysis of SIPRI data by 24/7 Wall St, the following companies made the most money from governments' addiction to war-spending and the demand for arms in conflict zones all over the world: 20. 텍스트론 Textron 소재국 Country: 미국 United States 무기매출 Arms sales: 41억 달러 $4.1 billion 총 매출  Total sales: 142억 달러 $14.2 billion 이익 Profit: 12억 달러 $1.2 billion 주생산품 : 장갑차, 무인 항공기, 공격용 헬기  Main Products: Armored vehicles, unmanned aircraft, and attack helicopters. 19. 나발 그룹 Naval Group Country: 프랑스 France Arms sales: 41억 $4.1 billion Total sales: 42억 $4.2 billion Profit: $36.5 million 나발 방어시스템, 전함, 잠수함 Main Products: Naval defense systems, warships and submarines. 18. 레이도스 Leidos Country: United States Arms sales: $4.4 billion Total sales: $10.2 billion Profit: $242.0 million Main Products: IT infrastructure, data analytics, cyber security, logistics, surveillance vehicle and equipment development and maintenance 17. 롤스로이스 Rolls-Royce Country: United Kingdom Arms sales: $4.4 billion Total sales: $19.3 billion Profit: $5.3 billion Main Products: Defense aerospace, marine and nuclear power systems, including engines for aircraft like the C-130 Hercules, T-45 Goshawk, and Japanese military V-22 Osprey fleet. 16. 하니웰  Honeywell International Country: United States Arms sales: $4.5 billion Total sales: $40.5 billion Profit: $1.7 billion Main Products: Long-range weapons systems, operating systems for unmanned aerial vehicles, and missile navigation systems; Chinook helicopter T55 engines; maintenance and miscellaneous services. 15. 유나이티드 조선 United Shipbuilding Corp. Country: Russia Arms sales: $5.0 billion Total sales: $5.6 billion Profit: $101.0 million Main Products: Shipbuilding, repair and maintenance facilities across the Russian Federation. 14. 유나이티드 항공 United Aircraft Corp. Country:Russia Arms sales:$6.4 billion Total sales: $7.7 billion Profit: $325.3 million Main Products: MiG, Sukhoi, and Yak fighter jets. 13. 헌팅턴 잉갈 산업  Huntington Ingalls Industries Country: United States Arms sales: $6.5 billion Total sales: $7.4 billion Profit: $479.0 million Main Products: Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, surface combatants, amphibious assault and transport vehicles, and Coast Guard Cutters. 12. 엘- 쓰리 L-3 Technologies Country: United States Arms sales: $7.8 billion Total sales: $9.8 billion Profit: $693.0 million Main Products: Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance products and services; communications technology used in top U.S. drones such as Predator and Global Hawk; power distribution and communication technology used by the U.S. Navy's Virginia-class submarine. 11. 유나이티드 테크놀로지 United Technologies Corp. Country: United States Arms sales: $7.8 billion Total sales: $59.8 billion Profit: $4.9 billion Main Products: Advanced systems for military helicopters such as rescue hoists, autopilot systems, laser-guided weapon warning systems; engines used by military aircraft in 34 militaries worldwide, including the latest U.S. jets. 10. 알마즈- 앙테이  Almaz-Antey Country: Russia Arms sales: $8.6 billion Total sales: $9.1 billion Profit: $422.6 million Main Products: Surface-to-air missile systems. 9. 레오나르도  Leonardo Country: Italy Arms sales: $8.9 billion Total sales: $13.0 billion Profit: $310.3 million Main Products: Land and naval electronics; information systems; helicopters, jet aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles; torpedoes and ammunition, weapons systems. 8. 탈레스  Thales Country: France Arms sales: $9.0 billion Total sales: $17.8 billion Profit: $931.1 million Main Products: Land, air, sea and cyber defense products and services; radar systems for missile fire control. 7. 에어버스 그룹  Airbus Group Country: Trans-European Arms sales: $11.3 billion Total sales: $75.2 billion Profit: $3.3 billion Main Products: Commercial and private aircraft; Eurofighter Typhoon jet used in numerous militaries including the Gulf Arab states; cyber security; secure communication devices; A400M and C295 transport aircraft. 6. 제너럴 다이내믹스  General Dynamics Corp. (US) Country: United States Arms sales: $19.5 billion Total sales: $31.0 billion Profit: $2.9 billion Main Products: Warships such as the Arleigh Burke-class Destroyer and Zumwalt-class guided missile destroyer; submarines including the Columbia-class sub; the latest U.S. Army Abrams tank; communications/IT/cyber security systems. 5. 노드럽 그루먼  Northrop Grumman Corp. Country: United States Arms sales: $22.4 billion Total sales: $25.8 billion Profit: $2.0 billion Main Products: Fighter jets including the B-2 stealth bomber and F-35; maintenance for U.S. strategic fleets and communications sytems. 4. 비에이이  BAE Systems Country: United Kingdom Arms sales: $22.9 billion Total sales: $23.5 billion Profit: $1.1 billion Main Products: Ground combat vehicles such as the Challenger 2; fighter jets including the Typhoon and F-35. 3. 레이시온  Raytheon Country: United States Arms sales: $23.9 billion Total sales: $25.3 billion Profit: $2.0 billion Main Products: Air-to-surface, surface-to-air, air-to-air, and surface-to-surface precision guided missiles; bombs and torpedoes; tactical small-arms sights. 2. 보잉  Boeing Country: United States Arms sales: $26.9 billion Total sales: $93.4 billion Profit: $8.2 billion Main Products: Civilian aircraft such as the 737, 747, 767, 777, and 787 families; KC-46 refueling aircraft; P-8 Poseidon aircraft; F-15 fighters; Apache helicopters. 1. 록히드마틴  Lockheed Martin Corp. Country:United States Arms sales:$44.9 billion Total sales: $51.0 billion Profit: $2.0 billion Main Products: F-16, F-22, and F-35 fighter jets; sonar technologies; ships, missile defense systems, and missiles used by the Navy This article was sourced from The Mind Unleashed. Image credit: Anthony Freda Art ***************   엔에스에이는 대량감시프로그램을 포기하는데, 스노우든이 폭로했기때문 NSA Abandons Part Of Mass Surveillance Program Exposed By Snowden  By Tyler Durden Mar 5, 2019 - 10:02:04 PM                  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-05/nsa-abandons-mass-surveillance-program-exposed-snowden 국가 안보국 (NSA)은 전 계약직 직원인 에드워드 스노우덴 (Edward Snowden)에 의해 폭로된 악명 높은 감시 시스템의 일부를 포기한 것으로 알려졌는데, 그것은 미국인들의 통신기록 도청 수집에 사용되었던 것이다. 여기엔 전화 녹음, 컴퓨터 메타 데이터 및 텍스트 메시지가 포함됩니다. The National Security Agency (NSA) has reportedly abandoned part of their infamous surveillance apparatus exposed by former contractor Edward Snowden, and used for the mass collection of Americans' communications records; including phone logs, metadata and text messages. 뉴욕 타임즈는 하원 소수당 지도자의 국가안보 고문인 루크 머리 (Luke Murry)가 The Lawfare Podcast 에 NSA가 "지난 6 개월 간 실제로 그것을 사용하지 않고있다고 말하며 "[트럼프] 행정부가 그 백업을 시작했는지는 확실치 않다, "고 말했다. (2017 년에 530 만 개의 미국 전화기록을 수집했음에도 불구하고 그렇게 보고했다) NYT 보고서는 NSA가 XKeyscore와 같은 다른 프로그램을 포기한 것으로 주장하지 않습니다. XKeyscore는 전세계 인터넷 데이터를 검색하고 분석하는데 사용합니다. 독일 방송사 Norddeutscher Rundfunk의 질문에 "XKeyscore를 사용한다면 무엇을 할 수 있습니까?" 라는 질문에 에드워드 스노우든은 이렇게 대답했다 : The New York Times noted that House minority leader national security adviser Luke Murry told The Lawfare Podcast that the NSA "hasn't actually been using it for the past six months," and that he's "not certain that the [Trump] administration will want to start that back up" (despite collecting 530 million US phone records in 2017) Keep in mind, the NYT report isn't claiming the NSA has abandoned other programs such as XKeyscore - which the agency uses to search and analyze global internet data. When asked by German broadcaster Norddeutscher Rundfunk "What could you do if you would use XKeyscore?" Edward Snowden replied: 당신은 XKeyscore를 통해서 전 세계의 누구의 이메일이든 읽을 수 있습니다. 누구든지 당신이 그 사람의 이메일 주소를 가지고 있다면 누구의 것이건 읽을 수 있습니다. 모든 웹 사이트 : 웹 사이트와의 트래픽을 볼 수 있습니다. 개인이 앉아있는 컴퓨터 : 시청할 수 있습니다. 추적중인 랩톱 : 전 세계 곳곳을 이동하면서 따라가 볼 수 있습니다. 그것은 NSA의 정보에 액세스 할 수있는 원 스톱 상점입니다. ... 개인을 태그 (추적 도청) 할 수 있습니다 ... 독일의 주요 기업에서 일하고 그 네트워크에 대한 액세스를 원한다면 어딘가에있는 양식의 웹 사이트에서 사용자 이름을 추적할 수 있습니다. 추적해서 그의 본명을 파악할 수 있습니다. 친구들과의 관계를 통해 지문 fingerprint이라 불리는 것을 만들 수 있습니다. 지문은 네트워크 활동으로 어디에서나 인터넷에 접속할 수있는 곳입니다.  -에드워드 스노우든 You could read anyone's email in the world, anybody you've got an email address for. Any website: You can watch traffic to and from it. Any computer that an individual sits at: You can watch it. Any laptop that you're tracking: you can follow it as it moves from place to place throughout the world. It's a one-stop-shop for access to the NSA's information. ... You can tag individuals ... Let's say you work at a major German corporation and I want access to that network, I can track your username on a website on a form somewhere, I can track your real name, I can track associations with your friends and I can build what's called a fingerprint, which is network activity unique to you, which means anywhere you go in the world, anywhere you try to sort of hide your online presence, your identity. -Edward Snowden 주목할만한 것은 제임스 클래퍼 (James Clapper) 전 국가 정보국장이 NSA 대량 데이터 수집에 대해 의회에 거짓말을 했다는 사실이다. 와이든 Ron Wyden (D-OR) 상원의원의 2013 년 질문에 대한 응답으로 "NSA는 수백만 또는 수백만의 미국인에게 모든 유형의 데이터를 수집합니까?"라고 Clapper에게 질문했을때, 그는 대답했습니다.  "아니요, 고의적으로 하지 않습니다. " Of note, former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, was caught lying to Congress about the NSA's bulk data collection. In response to a 2013 question by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions, of Americans?," Clapper replied: "No sir, not wittingly." Instead of a DOJ subpoena for lying to Congress, Clapper now collects a paycheck as a CNN contributor. Initiated under President George W. Bush in 2001 in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks and exposed by intelligence contractor Edward Snowden, the bulk metadata collection program was scaled back under the 2015 Freedom Act - set to expire this year, which kept records in the hands of carriers such as AT&T and Verizon that could quickly be accessed via a court order. Yet the scale of collection remained huge: The program gathered 151 million records in 2016, despite obtaining court orders to use the system on only 42 terrorism suspects in 2016, along with a few left over from late 2015. In 2017, it obtained orders for 40 targets and collected 534 million records. Problems with the system emerged last year, when the National Security Agency said it had decided to delete its entire database of records gathered since the Freedom Act system became operational. Glenn S. Gerstell, the agency's general counsel, said in an interview at the time that because of complex technical glitches, one or more telecom providers - he declined to say which - had responded to court orders for records by sending logs to the agency that included both accurate and inaccurate data. -New York Times